Or maybe—just maybe—this post was about commemorating innocent victims, rather than drawing attention to a horrific act of violence. Read more
Or maybe—just maybe—this post was about commemorating innocent victims, rather than drawing attention to a horrific act of violence. Read more
Hmmmm, no. Read more
Or, really, dagnAbbott Read more
dagnabbit. Read more
Thanks for the catch! Read more
“People not in mke love him! Go Clarke!” Read more
Sorry to hear you think statues honoring people who killed people to ensure that they could own and enslave other people are a good thing. Read more
Well. Had. Read more
I would love to see the WSJ write about how profoundly fucked we are. Read more
No, he rejected the story “as reported,” which could mean any number of things. He then denied “intelligent sources or methods” were discussed - two specific things that were NOT mentioned in the Washington Post’s original reporting. Read more
hahaha Read more
haha, neither was I! I’m genuinely lousy at catching those sorts of mild copy-edits, so I appreciate it when someone catches it before a post’s been up for months. Read more
That would be her father. Read more
For a stupid little typo like this, I’m totally happy to own up to it. Read more
Ah, that’s what transcribing in a hurry will get me. Thanks for the catch! Read more
I think there’s a lot of confusion and misinformation about the state of immigration in the United States today. Where would be a good place for a total novice to start when it comes to understanding what that debate looks like now, and how we got here? Are there any must-read books or articles you can recommend? Read more